I am saying every single one of these claims have never wound up being actually true since they go against the very nature of physics. Yet people perpetuate the claims and defend them without the supporting data.

So to not provide the data for one claim, while providing the data for another is only done to mislead from the truth.

Sorry for not accepting what they say at face value since it goes against multiple things.

It’s data they should have had to begin with, they made the claim. Of course it’s going to be questioned, they could have been upfront with the data.

What other reason would they omit it? Other than to mislead if it wasn’t actually 100%.

It’s funny how I am “demanding” something that would be just basic decency to include along with their claim, they provided the data for the sound after all……

I thought having a conversation about the validity of their claims would be an okay thing to do in this community?

Or are you saying this place is for something else?

So they could provide the testing data to prove it. Even the numbers, don’t need a full detailed video.

The lack of proof to their claims is concerning.

They’ve made a claim they should have known would need to be verified, eventually…… its bush league for that on its own.

Just saying it doesn’t decrease the power is a norm claim without providing anything technical to support it.

I’ve read multiple articles and videos and yet this very crucial information is intentionally not included.

The claims are false, you can’t suppress or mute something with a tradeoff, unless they have somehow magically figured out physics anomalies.

I’ve read the article attached, the article linked in that, and the video linked as well.

Not one talks about anything technical other than it doesn’t decrease the power, so where’s the stats to prove it? You can’t silence or muffle something without a tradeoff, we ignoring basic physics here?

So what is it do your think your non-informational comment is proving? Theres no test information to support the non power diminishing claim, and I call bullshit from basic physic principles.

There’s no way this won’t affect the final CFM or Velocity of the air.

This would be no different than running it at a little less than 100% power, but wastes that energy instead.

Why else would they not provide any technical detail, even a wind velocity test would be huge FFS.

They just reload a previous cached comment, doesn’t matter how many times you edit or delete, it’s all logged and backed up.