Ahh okay

Stone v Graham was exactly this. Kentucky tried to put the Ten Commandments into schools. SCOTUS said no.

That’s already part of the SCOTUS rulings.

I’ve been running a kind of long experiment over the years. I search the same word every now and then. Watching the top results change has been fascinating. It’s gone from definitions to ads, and now it automatically tries to link into Google maps too. The original top results aren’t even visible without scrolling anymore.

They’ll be quick to tell you that the Constitution doesn’t actually explicitly state they should be separated. And what it really means is no one can stop them from proselytizing because that would prohibit the free exercise of religion. Of course they’ll also tell you there is no religion other than the 1853 convention of Eastern sect Southern Baptists. Everything else is a heretical lie that needs to be burned.

Oh they’ll invite a “scholar” all right. The southern Baptist militia chaplain would love to preach to some kids.

Lol no. And SCOTUS has said no several times. There is no, “oops I left my Bible out and accidentally converted some kids” carve out for government employees. Religion stays at the door.

Unfortunately CoS existed first by a few decades. Thankfully you can’t use IP protections for a religion so TST just tries to ignore them.

Please no. CoS is basically narcissism as a religious cult. TST are the ones doing the real work. And having actual common sense rules up there rather than edgy bullshit is going to do far more good.

People forget brooms exist. Just like using a shovel during the winter.

The data they can just scrape from Google maps? Hell they can see where soldiers are deployed because of their fitness apps sharing running routes on social media.

This is black helicopter level conspiracy shit.

And how is the CCP going to put you in a camp in the US? You sound like conservatives who are afraid the UN will declare a peace keeping mission here.

I think they want the UAW gone. But GM and Ford give them too much money for them to get rid of the companies.

The car tech. But also, using Mexico’s power infrastructure as a guide to American tariffs on Chinese EVs doesn’t make sense.

Yeah I tend to be a jerk when someone starts trying to sound smart by making distinctions without a difference as a way to cast doubt.

I wasn’t going to go there because projection is, unfortunately, very effective at making the other party look immature when they correctly call you on it. But yes the entire discussion of data harvesting is a whataboutism. It’s not relevant unless someone stops doing it.

So the company doesn’t get the sale price? Why does the customer need the rebate if they haven’t given the company that money in the first place?

Do you not understand how a purchase works?

Take your bad faith bullshit somewhere else.

It doesn’t make sense to bar an entire sector of EVs over it either though. Caring about it only when that country does it is the peak of bigotry and simping for the executives who would happily grind you down for profit.

Yeah I know. By popular demand. They didn’t plan to bring it back until people complained about one of the only affordable EVs being removed from the market. But it’s coming back on their ultium platform that’s been plagued with problems.

That’s literally in the textbooks as the kind of thing you’re not supposed to do. If you keep protecting US companies they will never get better. Prices will never come down.