Home builders have used their political muscle to prevent states and cities from adopting the latest code, which would lower the climate impact of new houses

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If we’re building efficient homes, can we at least put ethernet ports in every room? I’m tired of having to essentially run conduit about the house.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Developers have and always will be parasites. They swoop in, swoon cities to get sweet deals and tax write-offs, rezoning, whatever. Then they short term profit, cash out and run. I’ve seen so many homes over the years with random design flaws, entire neighborhoods with design flaws. Developers are long gone and the homeowners get stuck with the bill.

    They play the same game as oil drillers. Form an LLC, fly in, shit all over the place, dissolve the LLC, and leave a mess behind. Laws around development of any kind should be structured so they can’t cut and run, but since the rich write the narrative, they’ll keep getting away with it, with occasional feel-good fines to make it look like the system works.

  • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “A federal study found that North Carolina’s proposed code update would have added at most about $6,500 to the price of a newly built home, not $20,400. According to the analysis, these changes would have paid for themselves through lower power bills…”

    I feel like if you’re buying a NEW house, and $6500 extra is too much, you shouldn’t be buying a house…

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What’s important here is that the lower bills would have paid for the higher mortgage. But this wouldn’t benefit the homebuilders, so they fought it