Piped link | Invidious link

“Because green skyscrapers and high-rises are a bullshit non-solution to serious systemic problems.”

“But if you want greenery on a building nonetheless, do I have an idea for you – a portable, modular, scalable solution called ‘potted plants on your balcony’.”

  • HanzAndHisFlammenwerfer@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This significantly oversees the fact that plants help in cooling the building down and to increase air quality.

    Shure its not “The solution” but there is no singular solution to our problems, it can help. And as long as we don’t build to high (wich is super inefficient) it should be a perfectly good part of the solution, and one that does not cost much.

  • föderal umdrehen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    So much of this video hinges on the assumption that if you have greenery on buildings, you can’t also have greenery on the ground. Sure, in an ideal world, you can use the fact that greenery on the ground is easier to maintain to guide priorities. In this current less-than-ideal world though, the city owns the road and a private developer owns the building and neither side can really force the other to add greenery.

    • mayooooo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s always about the money. And if you are building a high building chances are you don’t have acres around. And like you say, the solution is not building a dumbass vertical garden, it’s politics. Green the city because you as a citizen should force the city to be good

    • cerement@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      limited budget – you can pay for structural changes and maintenance costs to put greenery on the building or you can use that same money for a lot more greenery at street level where it benefits a lot more people

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I insists these are great, and not a solution to anything (the green thing is just marketing). Basically a form of fasade, the look of things etc.

    And regarding implementation, they are just dog shit bad bcs often neither contractors nor architects are incentivized to spend time & money on it (they get most of their moneys by selling, not maintaining).

    But there are solutions that were properly implemented and work all over the world. Even as retrofits to old buildings. Or to cover up outside walls where there aren’t any windows for various reasons.

    And also, most (green or non-green) highrises have some leaks, it’s basically just a big complicated block that is bound to have imperfections.

    And also 2, big core systems implemented have to be maintained as designed. Just like sprinkler systems have to be inspected and tested by law. Eg if we stop maintaining our air ventilation system (with filtration, humidification, and some pre-heating/cooling) I bet we get bacteria and fungi (maybe invertebrates) pumped around the building.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exactly.

        And hospitals had to solve the problem which is a system many buildings nowadays use (a bit depending on local climate needs). We now have osmosis water filtration for the humidifier (like 10+ kW for colder winter months?), HEPA filters before and after, mechanical & screen filters for the inlets (for potential smog particles, pollen, paragliders, that soft or thing) and probably much more stuff (various sensors, noise traps, regulators, fans, …). All components have their own maintenance needs.

        But if we were to cheap out and not hire actual professionals that are good at their jobs … believe it or not, we all turn into an army of legionnaires and storm the city. And since we are in Europe, I mean highly organized Roman legionnaires.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The reality is plants are beautiful and greenery is good for the environment. So as long as you do not put literal trees on a building it should be fine. Also modern tall buildings have cranes on top for facade work, window cleaning and so forth. So caring for plants is certainly possible. Also those green skyscrapers basically have potted plants on them as well.

    Plants also come with a lot of benefits. They cool the building when it needs cooling by providing shade and water. If you are in a colder climate and the plants you choose loose their leaves, they even allow sunlight on the facade, when heating is most needed, while shading it in summer. Plants like wine, which can easily be green on facades have useful fruits. As do many fruit trees, which can be grown from the ground floor in espalier fashion.

    Then we have roof gardens, which only have been in use since 600BC or so. They work and are nice.

    Also really import everybody has to look at a building and especially when you are building tall, they should make sure the building is beautiful. Plants are beautiful and are a great option for decoration.