I’ll note that if this works, it solves the methane problem, but not the land use problem associated with cattle.

Access options:

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not too surprising; we’ve been using selective breeding to radically alter everything we eat since the development of agriculture.

      • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Artificial selection and gene editing aren’t exactly the same thing. Also, trying to use technology to get out of technology-caused problems (the issues from raising and slaughtering tens of billions of bovine a year) is a modern techbrobillionaire-promoted pipedream, like us being able to colonize mars when we fail to address human-caused climate change on this planet

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Technical solutions aren’t crazy; we’ve pulled them off before for other problems. (Eg: sewage)

          It’s a question of whether the specific tradeoffs associated with a particular technical approach to a particular problem are worthwhile.

          • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I never said technical solutions were crazy. I just mean to draw attention to the fact that we’re reading a story published in a publication owned by the world’s richest man that says we don’t need to curb consumption currently causing a huge amount of greenhouse gas emissions that we know beyond all reasonable doubt are killing our planet and compromising the longevity of our species - because a sometime-in-the-future technology will rescue things, enabling us to keep consuming at levels that are unsustainable in many other areas beyond methane emissions.

            We are in the midst of a great propaganda effort to undermine concern about planetary health in the masses so that the investor class’ profits don’t slow down as the planet turns to shit. This article is a part of that

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Having one digestive tract per cow is kinda wasteful. Why not have dozens of cows hooked up to one central digestive system? The same goes from nervous systems.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sounds like precision fermentation is probably a better solution, but we should be exploring all avenues for sure.