• TurtlePower@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is no such thing as an illegal protest. That is a concept made up by the people being protested against so that they can squash it. Protests are not supposed to be “convenient”. They are not supposed to be comfortable or nice or pretty. They are supposed to force people to face the issue and band together to bring about real change.

        • parpol@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s not how it works. There is no country where protesting in the middle of the street without a permit is legal. There absolutely is something like illegal protesting, and what Just Stop Oil did was one example. Protests are about being seen, not causing inconvenience or even danger. You are not above the law just because you’re protesting. Getting a permit and demonstrating outside the white house would have been the correct way to go about this.

          The only people who banded together as a result of this protest were angry drivers banding together to remove the nuisance, and climate deniers who got radicalized by the rage, seeing Just Stop Oil protests.

          • solo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s one thing not to like illegal protests and a different one to equate them with anarchy. I understand that the term “anarchy” is often used as a synonym to “lawlessness” but in reality it is a movement that aims to eradicate societal hierarchies and replace them with horizontal organizational structures.

            Also as I’m sure you know, law is not set in stone, it does change. Many things that are legal now, were illegal in the past. Sometimes in order to influence lawmakers we need to do illegal stuff, like non-violent disruptive protests.

              • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                2 months ago

                Your 8-hour work week was achieved by “illegal protests” among other things. Getting rid of the divine right of kings was “illegal”.

                Setting the world on fire is somehow not “illegal” though.

              • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s appropriate when you’re trying to change certain things, not everything. When you’re trying to get civil rights or anything else that the higher ruling class doesn’t want you to have, it can and usually does necessitate illegal and violent protesting and uprising.

              • solo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Of course what you describe is a way of doing things. What you say and what I said are not exclusionary. People can have both legal and illegal approaches on the same topic. Sometimes it is justifiable on moral grounds to break the law, and many countries recognize that need in their constitutions.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If the protest isn’t illegal, you aren’t protesting, you are having a parade.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    People in here are arguing about whether the government should be able to allow or disallow protests, i.e. “legal” or “illegal” protests.

    I think Denmark has a good middle ground solution to this: Protests must be declared to the police ahead of time, so they know it is happening. Note that this is not an application or an ask for permission! You always have permission, you only have to make the police aware that you are protesting, so they can monitor it and ensure it follows law and order and doesn’t turn violent.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guys, I’m planning to cause a traffic jam, and you all are invited.

    Oh wait, that’s just normal traffic. Oh well, see y’all in jail.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is not acceptable anywhere. This “in a democracy” bit is just taking away blaim from dictator who do this kind of stuff all the time.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, the point of the sentence isn’t to take away blame. It is to compare them to dictatorships. I.E. Add more blame

  • NostraDavid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I still don’t understand why JSO is bothering common folk with their protests, go block politicians - you know, the people who YOU want to make the treatise to stop the use of oil!

    I agree with what they want (though it would’ve been nice if they had a plan how to slow down our oil use, but then again they’re no experts on that), but I do think they’re being dumb on how to achieve it. You don’t see Union Strikers block off a highway to get what they want, they’ll instead block off some plant where they work - now that makes sense! Go bother politicians.

    • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem with “they should have a plan” is that we have viable plans and nobody that’s currently benefiting from oil will take any steps towards implementing them.

  • parpol@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just Stop Oil are the people that were blocking traffic of normal everyday citizens.

    Their sentences weren’t lengthy enough in my opinion.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        Am I a liberal? I expect protests to have permission beforehand just like they need in Sweden where I am from. They would have been charged there too.

    • Ctri@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Peaceful protest should not be a cause for government punishment at all, this sentence is absolutely insane and should be revoked at the earliest convenience.

      The new government should restore our right to protest policies without fear of imprisonment.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is nothing peaceful about blocking traffic.

        It is first off illegal to protest on a busy road unless you’ve acquired a permit and have a way to redirect traffic. What they were doing were illegal protests.

        Second, it doesn’t matter what your message is. If you block traffic, you are the biggest cunt there is, and you are actively harming your own cause by showing the world what kind of people you are. If you’ve seen the videos, and read the comments, you know that 99% of the people are cheering when angry drivers pull the protesters by their hair out of the streets.

        • mranachi@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The entitlement of some people the moment they have a car. “Somebody took 20min of my time, they literally deserve 5 years in jail and to be assaulted in public.”. You’re sick, nothing your doing is important, sit in traffic and seeth. If you don’t like it, take the train.

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you think that their protest action should instead not inconvenience anyone so that it can continue to be ignored like all climate protests of that nature have been for decades?