• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, they’re trying to extract a bunch of tar, which requires enormous energy inputs to turn into a useful fuel, and which is tough to transport by pipeline.

      • HSR🏴‍☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    The rail route they’re trying to enable starts in rural east Utah, then heads into Colorado and travels mere feet away from the the Colorado river. Contamination of that water source would only affect Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California, and Mexico. What could possibly go wrong?

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I LOVE when Unelected Lifetime Officials decide to create their OWN Legislation! It’s a good thing NONE of these Unelected Lifetime Officials have any Conflicts of Interest!