• juicy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    As usual, Biden’s Justice Department is missing in action. After four years, we’re still waiting on any form of accountability for Trump. Thomas can rest easy.

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        At the same time, Thomas is beholden to the same Federal Corruption laws that any other federal employee is.

        • halferect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I thought they voted that the scotus is not beholden to the same federal laws as other judges or other federal employees. At this point the only people who can hold them accountable is congress.

          • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The judicial ethics code is self imposed by the Judicial Conference of the US (created by Congress), which does not impose those rules upon the Supreme Court. I do not know whether they have the authority to do so. The Supreme Court up until this scandal, had refused to implement their own ethics policy. And the one that they recently adopted is weak, both in terms of requirements and enforcement.

            • halferect@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              OK, I guess what I was thinking was their ethics policy which I recall being laughably weak basically saying if you are naughty nothing will happen. Thanks for clearing that up

      • juicy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        DOJ may not be able to do anything about Justices taking money from plaintiffs or other ethics violations, but they can certainly enforce the tax code.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s the part I’m interested in, I’df there’s really a tax issue. Maybe he really didn’t understand justices had to have ethics and morals, avoid corruption and conflicts of interest, and were just there to solicit gifts from plaintiffs, but how can he explain away if he didn’t pay taxes?

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The only thing Congress is needed for is to impeach and remove him. And since we know the chances of that happening are exactly zero, that makes them completely useless.

        SC judges aren’t immune to the law. The DOJ absolutely can investigate, arrest, and charge him just like they can any other citizen. Now, I’m not saying they will; I’m just saying they can. And if they had anything resembling balls, they would, and then Congress can then decide if they want a Supreme Court judge making rulings from inside a jail cell.

        But this is the Merrick Garland DOJ, which means he’s too afraid to mention Thomas’ name, let alone investigate him. And we all know Congress ain’t doing squat.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Who could’ve predicted that an AG that is part of the federalist society would go easy on a fellow federalist society member.