Use their logic against them.
Banned firearms by citing crime with firearms.
“logic”
These fucks who claim to be all about personal freedom sure hate when people make choices about their own bodies.
“You don’t tell me what to do. I tell you what to do.”
-GQP
Isn’t it already illegal to cover your face from above the nose downward in NC? I went there on a business trip a couple years before COVID, and wore a respirator while outside. A cop stopped me and told me that it’s against statute to cover my face in public places. I explained to him that I’m not from there and pollen in that state, at least in Charlotte, was horrific. He was understanding, but highly recommend I find another way. I thanked him and we parted ways. I was leaving the next day, so I didn’t find another way.
This article makes it sound that they’re not going to make it illegal, since it already is, but are, instead, going to make it a higher crime if you commit one while wearing a mask. What I’m gathering, is basically “wear one if you want. But if you commit a misdemeanor while wearing one, it’ll be a felony” (or however the scales increase). Did I misunderstand?
Yeah Lemmy is just really left and uninformed, mask prohibitions have existed in almost every state way before covid (talking 17-1800s) for exactly this reason. And frankly, even in NYC, outside of say health settings, the only people I see wearing masks are those who are actively trying to not be identified, and sometimes it nothing like yourself but more than likely theres a reason they don’t want to be identified and its rarely good.
Removed by mod
I wear a respirator every time I leave the house. If COVID taught us anything, it is that people are more disgusting and less considerate than we had imagined. Meanwhile, COVID is still a thing, long COVID is still a thing, and it’s progressive - every time you catch COVID the rates and the damage are worse.
That may be the law, but the law is bullshit. Why should I be required to show the world my face when I go outside? Why aren’t I entitled to privacy?
more than likely theres a reason they don’t want to be identified and its rarely good.
Source in on this, or are you scared of people in hoodies too?
I’m fairly certain that the source for this is bank robbers of yore. But this goes under “we do this, because we’ve always done it that way”, and it’s the absolute worst reason to keep doing something. I, for one, enjoyed and supported my right to wear masks for the sole reason that it hid a good part of my face. Didn’t do much for facial recog, as we saw, but humans have a hard time identifying and remembering faces without seeing a mouth. I knew the masks weren’t real respirators and weren’t nearly as effective as they could have been (the reason I wore an actual respirator pre COVID and during), but I very much enjoyed the added privacy for everyone nonetheless.
Actually, Anti Klan legislation.
I wore a mask to the store last weekend because I had to get something for my mom and had a pretty nasty sinus infection and didn’t want other people to catch my cold. If I have to be in a crowded place I also wear a mask because other people aren’t as considerate.
Number 1, i don’t want to have my face scanned by the bazillion different cameras all over the place.
Number 2, these people are citing campus protests as the reason why masks should be MORE illegal. They want to identify legal protesters for what reason? Seems fishy
Oh look… a bootlicker.
I was leaving the next day, so I didn’t find another way.
You did find another way - you left.
That’s fair. I also haven’t been back, but not because of him haha
If they’re going to do it, do it for the police too. No masks, no helmets, no hats, no sunglasses, no face shields, no gas masks. Name and badge number prominently displayed.
For the protestors, claim that it’s a requirement of their strongly-held religious beliefs to wear a mask whenever protesting. Checkmate 😎
No more Halloween in North Carolina I guess.
Banning masks is exactly as constitutional as banning hats - fundamentally incompatible with the 1A.
That’s fucking awesome! All those people wearing masks made my pee pee hurt. Freedumb!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The bill, which would raise penalties for someone who wears a mask while committing a crime, including arrested protesters, could still be altered as it heads back to the House.
But those backing the legislation say it is a needed response to the demonstrations, including those at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill that escalated to police clashes and arrests.
This strikethrough would return public masking rules to their pre-pandemic form, which were created in 1953 to address a different issue: limiting Ku Klux Klan activity in North Carolina, according to a 2012 book by Washington University in St. Louis sociology professor David Cunningham.
Democratic lawmakers repeated their unease about how removing protections for people who choose to mask for their health could put immunocompromised North Carolinians at risk of breaking the law.
Simone Hetherington, an immunocompromised person who spoke during Wednesday’s Senate Rules Committee, said masking is one of the only ways she can protect herself from illnesses and fears the law would prevent that practice.
But Republican legislators continued to express doubt that someone would get in legal trouble for masking because of health concerns, saying law enforcement and prosecutors would use discretion on whether to charge someone.
The original article contains 680 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
