While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys’ opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

  • telllos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The number of comment that says " I would buy one, but" is amazing !

    What this company is doing is what every company should do, from laptop to tablet. As well as tractors. Dot being able to repair what you buy is fundamentally flawed!

    • Dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yet they don’t sell in the USA, and they don’t have a headphone jack. A company meant for repairability and reliability not having a headphone jack. That’s like when framework removed it from the 16 inch laptop.

      • imperator3733@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think your comparison to Framework is justified since 1) they made a headphone jack expansion module that’s available along with all the other ports and 2) the Framework 16 has 6 expansion bays instead of 4. If you need a headphone jack you get a 25% increase in configurable ports, and if you don’t need one you get a 50% increase in ports. Plus, you can easily switch between those two cases.

        • Dog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. that is a solution to a problem nobody wanted.
          2. Technically 5 if you’re using one of them for the headphone jack (which you wouldn’t need if it was included on the device ready). Also the one with 4 already has a headphone jack included, so you’d still have 4 available ports.

          And 3.

          They’re small and I could lose it and would have to spend even more money for a replacement.

    • Nerdulous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, it is amazing. These people are giving honest constructive criticism of a product. Companies often have to pay money to get that information. These complaints are generally valid as well.

      The company’s commitment to repairability is commendable but it’s in lieu of other important factors. If I have to make the choice between having the newer OS with stronger, more powerful hardware or the ability to repair my device I’m going to choose the former every time. From the get-go the device might last longer simply because I won’t want to get rid of it as quickly. The 5 is of course a significant improvement over previous releases but it’s still behind. If they can deliver a device that is not immediately outdated in comparison to other phones of similar price then this would be a no brainer for me and likely others as well.

      Similarly availability is another major factor. You can’t buy what you can’t get your hands on. Even more importantly it’s even more futile to buy one for a network that doesn’t support it at all. Obviously the creators just aren’t ready to expand into another market and that’s fine but it doesn’t make the criticism any less important for their mission.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Amazing.

        I’m sick of buying a new phone every three years because the battery is dead or the processor is slow, nothing can be replaced without it being wildly expensive and now it’s a paperweight.

        • PeachMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, I don’t think the Fairphone will help much with outdated processors. You can’t upgrade the processor inside, and it comes with a relatively slow processor from day one.

          This phone is not for people that need performance; it’s a very basic phone for people that value an ethical supply chain and repairability.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Relative slow my arse imo.Its all about use cases and the (potential shitty) apps you run. Been using the fp4 just perfectly fine for months, and before that the one plus x on android 11 just fine.

            I would like to know what apps you use that would need the speed of anything besides the “best”?

            ( and for anyone wondering, one of the reasons you cant switch processor is because of the imei thats burned in. Changing that basically means that the whole id of the phone changes, including links to your mobile provider. It isnt allowed in some places )

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                If that’s the sum total of your reasons for needing a more expensive, less free, less repairable phone, then I have nothing left except to laugh at you.

                • PeachMan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, I just don’t have the time to explain the hundred obvious ways that a fast processor might benefit somebody, so I chose a single, INCREDIBLY obvious item near the top of the list for most people, and was hoping that I wouldn’t get follow-up idiotic responses like this. But alas!

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish another viable mobile OS would come out. I don’t want android and apple iOS is wearing thin on me.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not going to criticize the project, because it’s good. But, to me, using anything that gives Google an edge in controlling the direction of technology is bad. So, no Chromium products and no Android.

            • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I despise Google, and I agree with chromium, but when the only other alternative is using the proprietary walled garden that is iOS, I’ll take degoogled Android everyday.

                • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  For a regular user… basically nothing.

                  I quit google products and services a decade ago, so I was “relegated” to iOS, which… does basically the same exact fucking thing but better in every way. It’s spendy though. I also like their privacy stance, which is “we cost a lot but we’re not selling all of your data to advertisers”

                  I have not found a single thing I can’t do on iOS that I COULD on Android.

                  People spout WaLLeD GaRdEn and what I read is “privacy” and I’m in

                • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  For starters, you can degoogle Android, you can’t deapple iOS.

                  You can replace the manufacturer android with a clean, free software and secure Android ROM, like GrapheneOS. iOS is a black box, fully proprietary and controlled by Apple.

                  You can install apps from third parties on Android, like F-Droid. On iOS every app must be approved by Apple.

                  You can’t use an iPhone without an Apple account, you can use Android without a Google account.

                  Android has multiple profiles support, which comes handy for completely isolating apps from the rest of your phone.

                  There’s much, much more. That’s just what came to my mind right now.

                • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Personally, I like using the terminal on my phone, and the only terminal I found for iOS is extremely slow because its emulating linux.