vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 months agoCongress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Bidenwww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkCongress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Bidenwww.usatoday.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-27 months agoWow this comment really unwinds the one you replied to, so much so that the original seems in bad faith Edit op edited, and improved their comment. You don’t need to defend them, they are fine on their own
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-27 months agoThe incomplete characterization that the drug was READY for us markets. It is not fda approved. Edit After discussion, the op elected to make the seen edits in their comment. I’d refer you to them.
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months ago@astreus never made that claim. It is currently available in Cuba, Colombia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Peru and Paraguay.[
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoThis has already been discussed and op met my edit request. You aren’t part of this.
minus-squareastreus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoFor the sake of transparency, I edited before you suggested I did - hence my comment “I had not done the research and have edited my comment above.” 😉
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoMy edit request was met. No comment on order of operations.
minus-squareastreus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoNow who’s being disingenuous 😂 The implicature of cause and effect is reversed
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoWhen I made my claim your comment was not of quality, you hadn’t edited yet. When token boomer was commenting to me, you had.
Wow this comment really unwinds the one you replied to, so much so that the original seems in bad faith
Edit op edited, and improved their comment. You don’t need to defend them, they are fine on their own
Reuters is bad faith?
The incomplete characterization that the drug was READY for us markets.
It is not fda approved.
Edit After discussion, the op elected to make the seen edits in their comment. I’d refer you to them.
@astreus never made that claim.
This has already been discussed and op met my edit request. You aren’t part of this.
For the sake of transparency, I edited before you suggested I did - hence my comment “I had not done the research and have edited my comment above.” 😉
My edit request was met. No comment on order of operations.
Now who’s being disingenuous 😂
The implicature of cause and effect is reversed
When I made my claim your comment was not of quality, you hadn’t edited yet. When token boomer was commenting to me, you had.